Challenge process
The Standard's claim to completeness is procedural, not declarative: completeness means every demonstrated omission has a path into the standard, and every score has a path to correction. All challenges are versioned and public, so the framework itself stays falsifiable — not only the arithmetic inside it. Accepted challenges produce a published correction; the challenger is credited by name.
Leaf challenge
Disputes a score for a specific subject-instance, with evidence. Resolved against the evidence tiers — higher tier wins.
Constitutional challenge
Proposes adding or removing a property, changing a gate, the tail rule, the evidence tiers, or default weights, with argument.
Completeness challenge
Demonstrates a scorable monetary or system property that is absent, or a contested value treated as scorable. A sustained one produces a new property or axis in the next version, with the challenger credited.
Public challenge log
No challenges have been published yet. Submitted challenges are reviewed before publication.